The internet is littered with
sponsored ads. In my opinion,
“LeafFilter” (aka LeachFilter) gets
a big thumbs-down for piggybacking
off leafBuilder’s top search ranking results.
Click here to enlarge image below.
Are Google’s and Bing’s search engine algorithms systematically inundating Black and other minority websites with sponsored ads but not applying the same discriminatory practice to White-owned sites that are in their top search engine results?
More specifically, I’ve observed on both a mobile device and a desktop computer that Google’s and Bing’s search engine algorithms repeatedly allowed sponsored ads for the company “LeafFilter” to overshadow “LeafBuilder” search results. Even when performing a search on the exact keyword “LeafBuilder,” LeafFilter appeared as a sponsored ad in the top search results. Why? LeafFilter has nothing to do with the trademark “leafBuilder.” Google’s and Bing’s search engines have only served to redirect viewers’ attention to LeafFilter’s products and services. It appears to be a racist, biased, and slanted advertisement ploy that both Google’s and Bing’s search engine algorithms are rigged to take advantage of. It’s not the search engines that deserve the criticism but the people behind them that know what they are doing.
LeafFilter’s cable TV ads are also in high rotation on networks like CNN and MS NOW. That in and of itself may explain why the company has such an incessant presence on the internet. Needless to say, if any company has to secretly purchase ratings reviews, engage in bribes, piggyback off another entity’s online search results, or consistently overwhelm consumers with annoying cable TV ads, that may speak volumes to the kind of services and products it offers.
This may also interest you: “Bias in Search Engines And Algorithms” | And this, “The Justice Department is about to make its case for a Google breakup” | And lastly, this, “LeafFilter Alternatives” GutterGuards explains why it has a better product.
Leave a Reply
Your email is safe with us.